How could creativity potentially impact on
primary education?
This post will create discussion around creativity within education
and explore the impact it has on a child’s learning.
Although definitions of creativity can be identified; it may also be a
term than can become overcomplicated due to the uncertainty of the term.
Torrance, (1988) stated that “creativity defies a precise definition because it
is largely unseen, nonverbal, and unconscious” (p.43). This uncertainty of a
non conclusive definition could be as a result to researchers not treating the
study of creativity in much detail. Several different views have been included
in the creativity debate (Starko 2013) and most theorists agree that creative
process involves immeasurable positive results for a child’s learning and
development.
My view of creativity mirrors that of Sharp’s who suggests the idea
that it involves the “imagination and originality” (Sharp, 2004. P.5) Another
view that correlates the views of Sharp includes “Creativity as: imaginative
activity fashioned so as to produce outcomes that are both original and of
value” (NACCCE 1999, p.30) I believe this statement to be true as in order for
it to be identified that we are thinking creatively, we must be original and
ensuring that our idea is authentic. It is often the ideas that are viewed as ‘different’
and ‘unique’ that are suggested to be creative as it is highlighted by Charles
Mingus “Creativity is more than just being different.” I believe children
should be encouraged to be creative and assured that when thinking creatively
they are having a beneficial affect on their development and education as a
whole. It should be emphasised that creative thinking also enables the
application of knowledge in order to generate a variety of different ideas
through divergent thinking (Casakin,2007).
A personal experience that relates to creative
learning and imagination includes a session I participated in with other
students. We worked with a local primary school, and in the session we talked
about 'authentic learning'. We built fairy castles, rafts and looked for trees
that were in disguise. Immediately I was able to recognise the children that
would engage automatically and those that would need a little help finding
their creative identity.
The Fairy Raft
In conversation with the
pupils it was mentioned that they found easier to be creative when working
outdoors. They said that having the natural environment around them while
learning helped them spark their imagination in ways that would not be possible
in the classroom. The children also stated how they enjoyed the freedom of the
outdoors. Forest Schools aims are to promote the holistic development of all
those involved, fostering resilient, confident, independent and creative
learners (Knight, 2013). Learning outdoors allows children to make curriculum
links while making it more engaging and relevant. Forest schools provides
contact with the natural world and provides hands on experience for those that
need it. The children became more confident as the session progressed and their
engagement increased. According to Winnicott (1964), children believe that they
own their environment and the people in it. This became apparent amongst the
children as I observed how they worked with their peers and used their
imagination.
How could creativity potentially impact on
primary education?
This post will create discussion around creativity within education
and explore the impact it has on a child’s learning.
Although definitions of creativity can be identified; it may also be a
term than can become overcomplicated due to the uncertainty of the term.
Torrance, (1988) stated that “creativity defies a precise definition because it
is largely unseen, nonverbal, and unconscious” (p.43). This uncertainty of a
non conclusive definition could be as a result to researchers not treating the
study of creativity in much detail. Several different views have been included
in the creativity debate (Starko 2013) and most theorists agree that creative
process involves immeasurable positive results for a child’s learning and
development.
My view of creativity mirrors that of Sharp’s who suggests the idea
that it involves the “imagination and originality” (Sharp, 2004. P.5) Another
view that correlates the views of Sharp includes “Creativity as: imaginative
activity fashioned so as to produce outcomes that are both original and of
value” (NACCCE 1999, p.30) I believe this statement to be true as in order for
it to be identified that we are thinking creatively, we must be original and
ensuring that our idea is authentic. It is often the ideas that are viewed as ‘different’
and ‘unique’ that are suggested to be creative as it is highlighted by Charles
Mingus “Creativity is more than just being different.” I believe children
should be encouraged to be creative and assured that when thinking creatively
they are having a beneficial affect on their development and education as a
whole. It should be emphasised that creative thinking also enables the
application of knowledge in order to generate a variety of different ideas
through divergent thinking (Casakin,2007).
The Fairy Raft |
|
||
Within education, particularly in the foundation phase, I believe
there is a significant hunger for creativity due to emphasis put on the
development of “enterprising creative contributors” in the new welsh curriculum
(Donaldson, 2015). In order for students to successfully fulfil the criteria of
the new curriculum, creative thinking is essential both in and outside of the
classroom in order to ‘make a difference for the better’ (QCA 1999:11-12).
Theorists that have similar views on creativity
include both Plato and Rousseau. They argued many years ago that children
should learn in imaginative and creative ways that keep them in tune with their
natural ways of learning (Plummeridge 1980). This is important for them in
order to gain knowledge in addition to keeping their imagination active. In the
US it was Dewey that mirrored the views of Plato and Rousseau, but in Europe
theorists Montessori and Piaget were spreading the same message. Each of the theorists
shared the same belief that “children learn from doing” (Pound 2012). They both
agreed that children should be given the opportunity to learn from “real life
materials and experiences” (Mooney, 2013, p.38). Having this creative opportunity within a
classroom is vital in a child’s development as it exposes them to new
challenges and enables them to learn with materials that they will be using
later in life. This could impact on primary education as children are becoming
more aware at a younger age of what is to come in their future years. Research
suggests that autonomy and choice facilitate creativity (Craft, 2002) so
ensuring choice and child led learning is available in classrooms is important
in the encouragement of creativity.
According to Duffy (2006: xvi), "it seemed as though creativity
had been relegated to the back seat in education but has made a come back"
due to the value of creativity across the curriculum and also in a child’s
understanding. Despite creativity being associated with expressive arts, the
new shift for cross-curricular is ensuring that children are able to foster
creative characteristics through all projects and subjects. The arts alone
provide children with practical and visual learning experiences that enable
them to express themselves and become confident individuals. Therefore,
promoting creativity within all aspects of education and making it a priority
joins up the curriculum making it more purposeful for children. Creativity has
an immediate impact on the stimulation of practical learners that use the
constructivist approach (Hein,1991).
In the UK, Every Child Matters and the Children Act (Dfes 2004)
provide the right of every child to;
•
Be healthy
•
Stay safe
•
Enjoy and achieve
•
Make a positive
contribution
•
Achieve economic
well-being
Creativity ensures that the rights of each child are met. Without the
opportunity for children to explore imagination and creativity these rights may
not be fulfilled. This underlines the significance creativity has on a child’s
immediate early year education and early life as a whole. Although educational
policies come and go, it is essential that the demonstration of developmental
approaches is present within schools and they are providing a sound basis for
learning through the constructivist perspective. The exploration of creativity and imagination
should be taken advantage in order for children to make the most of their
education.
Bibliography
Casakin, H. P. (2007). Factors of metaphors in design
problem-solving: Implications for design creativity. International Journal
of Design, 1(2), 21-33.
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas.
Psychology Press.
Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful futures: independent review of
curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales: February 2015.
Duffy, B. (2006). Supporting creativity and imagination in the
early years. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Hein, G. (1991). Constructivist learning theory. Institute for
Inquiry. Available at:/http://www. exploratorium.
edu/ifi/resources/constructivistlearning. htmlS.
International handbook of creative learning (pp/45-53). New York.
Routledge.
N.A.C.C.C.E. (1999) All our futures: creativity, culture and
education. London: DfEE
Knight, S. (2013) ‘What Makes A Forest Schools?’. Forest
School and Outdoor Learning in the Early Years 2nd ed. 3 Church Street: Singapore Ltd.
Mooney, C.G. (2013) Theories of childhood, Second edition: An
introduction to Dewey, Montessori, Erikson, Piaget & Vygotsky. 2nd edn.
San Francisco, CA, United States: Redleaf Press.
Plummeridge, C. (1980). Creativity and music education-the need for
further clarification. Psychology of Music, 8(1), 34-40.
Pound, L. (2012). How children learn: From Montessori to
Vygosky-educational theories and approaches made easy(Vol. 1). Andrews UK
Limited.
Sharp, C. (2004) Developing young children’s creativity: what can
we learn from research? Topic (32) pp.5-12
Starko, A. J. (2013). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of
curious delight. Routledge.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its
testing. The nature of creativity, 43-75.
Winnicott, D. W. (1964). The Child, the Family, and the
Outside World. Harmondsworth (Penguin) 1964.
Qualification
and Curriculum Authority (QCA) (1999) The National Curriculum Handbook for
Primary Teachers in England. London:QCA.
Hi Rachael, I found your creativity blog very interesting and passionate. I am also in agreement with Sharp's (2004, p.5) views on creativity, as creativity is one of great value, involving seeing, thinking and innovating (Craft, 2000). Furthermore, I found it interesting when the children you were working with mentioned they found it much easier to be creative in the outdoors, through 'accelerated learning' as Chowns (2003) states that all children are born with a natural instinct to explore and experiment to develop their creativity. You mentioned that it important to implement creativity both to outdoor play and in the classroom (QCA, 1999), however, what activities can be done to successfully accomplish this?
ReplyDeleteMaddy, yes I have a real passion for stimulating creativity within young children and keeping the magic alive. I believe this is something that can be lost if children are not given the chance to be creative. I am also a strong believer of “children learn from doing” (Pound 2012) as I stated in my blog.
DeleteTo answer your question, creativity isn't necessarily an activity in itself. It is a way of children showing their capabilities and their own imagination. I believe creativity can be adopted in any lesson, context or environment as long as the fundamental conditions for creativity to happen have been facilitated. It is a personal opinion there is no right or wrong way of being creative as everyone is different. Providing children with the opportunity to role play, or activities that include storytelling is a good way of ensuring the imagination is sparked.
A few ideas to promote creativity
ReplyDelete1. Integrate hands on learning
2. Keep the layout of the classroom flexible
3. Encourage discussion
4. Replace hierarchy with collaborative learning spaces
5. Don't limit assignments to one format