This post will identify the purposes of education relating to the current recommendations made by
Professor Graham Donaldson and also highlight my personal pedagogical beliefs.
Purpose of Education
The
Donaldson Review (Donaldson,
2015) recommends four purposes for the new curriculum for
Wales;
Wales;
- Ambitious, capable learners who are ready to learn throughout their lives.
- Enterprising, creative contributors who are ready to play a full part in life and work.
- Ethical, informed citizens who are ready to be citizens of Wales and the world.
- Healthy, confident individuals who are ready to lead fulfilling lives as valued members of society.
Biesta (2009) proposed; it must be recognised that
there are many different perspectives surrounding what makes education purposeful
as the aims and ends for individuals may be different. Education itself sets
out to provide each learner with qualifications and social skills that will ultimately
prepare them for the world of work, but all this must start at primary
education.
It is a personal belief that the uppermost aim for education is for each
individual to successfully become literate, numerate and gain the ability to
think autonomously and creatively. Using these skills effectively to make
advancements in education will enable individuals to acquire qualifications allowing
access to further education. This progression can lead to higher education or
provide opportunity to enter the world of work. Education provides knowledge,
life skills and understanding to every dependant whilst providing opportunities
to grow; therefore, it has a very important purpose.
Noddings (2013)
states, “A primary purpose of schooling in a democratic society is to produce
thoughtful citizens who can deliberate and make wise choices” (p.25). A similar
view is featured in Successful Futures as Donaldson (2015) mirrors the thought of
Noddings in saying ‘the ultimate purpose
of education is to create ethical, ‘informed citizens
of Wales and the world.
The purpose of education is not just the final outcome - it is the constant
progression and development that each individual must make. Dewey (2012)
defined education as “the active process of transforming the existent situation. Not
perfection as a final goal, but the ever-enduring process of perfecting,
maturing, refining is the aim in living” (p.181). This highlights that education continues to
be purposeful as long as children are meeting their own personal milestones and
targets.
Pedagogical
Beliefs
Pedagogy is defined as “the method and practice of teaching,
especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept” (Stevenson, 2010,
p.1309). To oppose this Donaldson (2015) however, proposes that; “Pedagogy is
about more than ‘teaching’ in the narrow sense of methods used in the
classroom. It represents the considered selection of those methods in light of
the purposes of the curriculum” and the needs and developmental stage of the children
and young people (Donaldson, 2015, p. 63).
My personal pedagogical beliefs include the use of outdoor learning in order to
achieve a sense of freedom and a provide learners with a break from the
classroom. I believe it is;
1. Vital teachers protect and strengthen children's positive
dispositions to learning; those ‘habits of mind’ (Katz, 1999) such as curiosity
and resilience.
2. Important that children are given the
opportunity for child –led learning and practical, experiential learning and
real‐life problem solving; by engaging children in ‘sustained shared thinking’
(Siraj‐Blatchford & Sylva, 2004.)
3. Outdoor Learning
provides opportunity for children to develop their creativity and gain confidence
and self esteem;
However, Waite and Davis (2007) stated how free play and child-initiated exploration of the natural environment appeared to engage children to a greater extent than adult-led activities in Forest School. In this instance, both free play and forest school allow for creative thinking, although some argue one more beneficial than the other. Gardner’s research on multiple intelligences (1993) also suggests that naturalistic intelligence may influence the environment’s role in development. Furthermore, sensory contextualisation has been found to be an aid to memory (Gottfried et al. 2004). The benefits that are provided for learners when working outside the classroom are immeasurable; and in my opinion should be at the core of all pedagogical beliefs. It allows children to move freely (Rivkin, 2000) with space that would not be available in a classroom. Spitzer (2006) reminds us that the brain is always learning and that it is not just in designated contexts such as the classroom that this occurs. To support this, Waite (2011) claims that “the value of working outside the classroom is in providing pupils with experiences that are different from those inside it. … We want them to learn to behave in ways that are different to classroom behavior” (p.14). Outdoor learning provides “freedom and fun; ownership and autonomy; authenticity; love of rich sensory environment and physicality for pedagogical practice” (Waite, 2011, p.65).
With the new curriculum due to come in to play; I believe this is the perfect opportunity for current educators to take full advantage of the freedom they will get in their pedagogy. The new curriculum provides the opportunity for teachers to make cross-curricular links in what ever way they see necessary. Allowing room for extra outdoor learning and putting emphasis on that area would have an immediate impact on individual learners and their education as a whole.
Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: HarperCollins.
Gottfried, J.A., A.P.R. Smith, M.D. Rugg, and R.J. Dolan. 2004. Remembrance of odors past: Human olfactory cortex in cross-modal recognition memory. Neuron 42: 687–95.
Waite, S., B. Davis, and K. Brown. 2006a. Current Practice and Aspirations for Outdoor learning for 2–11 year olds in Devon. July 2006, final report for funding body EYDCP (zero14plus). Exmouth, UK: University of Plymouth.
Waite, S., B. Davis, and K. Brown. 2006b. Five stories of outdoor learning from settings for 2– 11 year olds in Devon. July 2006, final report for funding body EYDCP (zero14plus). Exmouth, UK: University of Plymouth.
Bibliography
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education
in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose
in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation
and Accountability (formerly: Joutnal of Personnel Evaluation in Education),
21(1), 33-46.
Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales. Welsh Government.
Gottfried, J.A., A.P.R. Smith, M.D. Rugg, and R.J. Dolan. 2004. Remembrance of odors past: Human olfactory cortex in cross-modal recognition memory. Neuron 42: 687–95.
Katz, L. G. (1995). Dispositions in Early
Childhood Education. In L. G. Katz (Ed.), Talks with Teachers of Young Children.
A Collection. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. ED 380 232.
Katz, L.,& Chard, S.C. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Maynard, T., & Waters, J. (2007). Learning in the outdoor environment: a
missed opportunity?. Early Years, 27(3), 255-265.
Noddings, N (2013) Education and Democracy in the 21st Century. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, USA.
Rivkin, M. S. (2000). Outdoor Experiences for
Young Children. ERIC Digest.
Siraj-Blacthford, I., & Sylva, K. (2004). Researching pedagogy in English pre-schools.
Waite, S., B. Davis, and K. Brown. 2006b. Five stories of outdoor learning from settings for 2– 11 year olds in Devon. July 2006, final report for funding body EYDCP (zero14plus). Exmouth, UK: University of Plymouth.
Waite, S. (2011) Children Learning Outside the Classroom.
London: Sage.
Waite, S. (2011). Teaching and learning outside the classroom: personal values, alternative pedagogies and standards. Education 3-13, 39(1), 65-82.
Hello, Rachael, I see that you have thoroughly commented on Donaldson's (2015) views and focus on implementing this new curriculum in Wales. When it comes to education I believe that it is a process of living (Dewey, 1963) and you have explored this carefully. You cited Biesta (2009) and his views that there is no absolute truth surrounding education, but different perspectives which build education's purpose and meaning. How education's aims are endless and never fixed to one motive. I found this video interesting as it spoke about education and what it is really for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HndV87XpkWg.
ReplyDeleteWith regards to pedagogy you are very much in favour of outdoor learning and being able to achieve and sense of freedom when learning. However, how well do you think this fits into the curriculum? Do you think that children should spend the majority of their educational time outdoors and learning freely (Rivkin, 2000) rather than learning in the classroom and preparing for future standardised tests?
Maddy, thank you for your comment... but I couldn't disagree more with the video that you provided a link to. It is my personal belief that the goal of education should not be just about about creating workers that will provide economical advantages. Although I understand this is essential- it is not always going to be the outcome for all educational users and this should be taken into close consideration. Instead, I believe the developmental stages children face throughout their education and the progression steps they will achieve should be the purpose of education. I think, each individuals 'purpose' for education will be different as not everyone will want to continue onto higher education and just becoming literate and numerate are their capabilities so therefore their specific individual purpose. We must ensure we are catering for ALL learners and not those capable of flying through education. "Students should study Shakespeare not because of the job it might get them but because its an anthropological guidebook that tells them how to live" (Carl Hendrick, 2017).
ReplyDeleteI think the initial purpose of education should be making learning fun so children want to continue learning through out their life. In my opinion, there is currently too much emphasis on exam results and testing which will in turn find individuals pursuing education for the wrong purpose. I think the current education system created by administrators and politicians is producing robots and this will hopefully change with the reccomendations from (Donaldson 2015) creating' imaginative thinkers' and 'capable learners'.
In regards to to my pedagogical beliefs I believe outdoor learning can fit into the curriculum however teachers please. Especially when the new curriculum comes in, the freedom and flexibility will allow teachers to plan their lessons according. Im not saying children should have every lesson outdoors, but the beauty of the new curriculum provides opportunity for this freedom to take place. So why not take advantage? Especially when there is so much evidence for outdoor learning really benefitting children and their development and learning. Although I put emphasis on forest school within my blogs, it does not always have to be a forest school lesson to reap the befits of outdoor learning. Literacy, Numeracy and even DCF lesson can be taken outside and just by being in the natural environment will provide children with a different environment to learn in. You can still have structured, disciplined lessons outside like you would indoors - the only thing changing would be the environment.
Preparing for standardised tests is important, I understand that, but this could be made easier by incorporating outdoor learning into this planning and perpetration. This could potentially make the stressful time less difficult for students and possibly more stimulating, engaging and motivating.
Carl Hendrick, (2017) Educationis and end in itself not a preparation for the workplace, Blog Post - chronotopeblog.com
Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales. Welsh Government