What is the
purpose of education?
It is strongly
suggested, “education corrects and transforms our
self-understanding” (Wiercinski, 2012, p.114). It allows us to
develop and accumulate our personal skills, knowledge, and self- discipline. “
Since human beings are not isolated individuals we realise that fulfilling the
call to live a good life lies in the quality of our relationships. Education is
therefore connected with the way we live with the other in the world that we
share” (Wiercinski, 2012, p.114). Similarly Nelson Mandela (2003) once argued
that education is the most influential proficiency to change the world and well
as have effect on future living (Mandela, 2003). Education cannot be
manufactured nor measured (Wiercinski, 2012, p.114).
Nonetheless, the purpose of
education can also be perceived as a social transformation, which links to
Vygotsky’s theory of social development and the alignment with “democratic
ideals” (Vadeboncoeur, 1997, p. 15). His theory displays that learning is more
of a “necessary and universal aspect of the process of developing culturally
organised, specifically human psychological function” (Vygotsky, 1978, p. 90).
Unlike Piaget’s belief that children’s development must lead their learning (McLeod,
2014). This view of education is mainly based on the theory of human
development “which locates the individual within a cultural setting and
identifies the subject of study as the dialectical relationship between the
two” (Vadeboncoeur, 1997, p. 15).
With regards
to Government policy, schools minister Nick Gibb gave a speech and addressed
the Education Reform Summit on his view on the purpose of education. He
evidently claimed that education and learning allows the economy to run, as it
is “the foundation of our culture and it’s an essential preparation for adult
life” (Government, 2015). Gibb’s view clearly exhibits a vocational approach to
education; as he wants to ensure that this learning could assist children as
well as, young people to receive the right preparation “they need to secure a
good job and fulfilling career” (Government, 2015).
Lastly,
education and learning should always be and remain relevant. When teaching
children, educators mark a great emphasis on teaching “logical reasoning
skills” and “factual knowledge”, which are seen as the main indicators of
“educational success” (Yang and Damasio, 2007, p.9). Unfortunately, There are
two problems to this attitude:
1.
Throughout our learning years
we will be challenged to use our skills and knowledge, nonetheless it is
significant that our education involves us not only physically but also
emotionally.
2.
Teachers are minimizing the
emotional factors of their academic curriculum that inheritably will not
prepare them for real-world situations, as educators are primarily focusing on
these sorts of knowledge (Yang and Damasio, 2007, p.9).
Education should simply been seen as a production, which
contributions (such a student teachers and textbooks) are combined to produce
desired achievements (such as students learning) (Tsang, 2003,
p.168).
What are
your pedagogical beliefs?
To
our understanding, pedagogy is primarily defined as the study of methods and
practices of teaching (Cambridge Dictionary, 2017). Saying this, there are many
discussions regarding pedagogy simply been seen as schooling. Smith (2012)
suggests that an efficient way of exploring pedagogy “is as the process of
accompanying learners; caring for and about them; and bringing learning into
life”, displaying that educators cannot be pushed or ‘banked’ (Freire, 1972)
into teaching knowledge that has been “drawn up by others” (Smith, 2012), but
to be able to grasp education and learning as a process of living (Dewey, 1963)
and to be able to make teaching worthwhile.
Similarly, as
Pestalozzi once acknowledged, “education is rooted in human nature; it is a
matter of head, hand and heart” (Brühlmeier, 2010), appreciating that education
will continuously be within us, therefore being a grand statement I thoroughly
agree with.
Finally,
in an article by Tait Cole written for ‘The Guardian’, Cole strongly argues
that teachers should embrace the means of pedagogy and heighten students to be
able to “demand equality for themselves and others” (Coles, 2014). He continues
by saying, that teaching a prescribed “core knowledge” will not help the growth
and development of children as they are given “carefully selected knowledge” to
learn from. Educators are not fully encouraging their students to think
critically about their surroundings and everyday living. They are not being
driven nor challenged (Coles, 2014). I agree with this statement, as it shows
that students need to be able to express themselves and that no system can
define them and their individual learning capabilities (Coles, 2014).
In conclusion, the purpose of education is
tremendously essential and should not be shadowed by other factors getting in
the way of educations purest reason to fundamentally educate children and young
people. It is something that is within an individual’s life as they grow up,
showing this significance.
Reference List:
Brühlmeier, A. (2010). Head, Heart and Hand. Education in the spirit of Pestalozzi.
Cambridge: Sophia Books.
Cambridge Dictionary (2017) ‘Pedagogy’.
Available at: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pedagogy
(Accessed on: 5 October 2017)
Coles, T. (2014) Critical Pedagogy: schools must
equip students to challenge the status quo. Available
at: https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2014/feb/25/critical-pedagogy-schools-students-challenge
(Accessed: 8 October 2017).
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education,
New York: Collier Books. [First published in 1938].
Freire, P. (1972). ‘Pedagogy of the Oppressed’. Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
Government (2015) The purpose of education.
Available
at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-purpose-of-education
(Accessed: 4 October 2017).
Mandela, N. R. (2003) 'Lighting you way to a better
future: Speech delivered by Mr N R Mandela at the launch of Mindset Network'.
McLeod, S. (2014) Lev Vygotsky: Simply Psychology. Available
at: https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html (Accessed: 3 October 2017).
Smith, M. K. (2012). ‘What is Pedagogy?’, the encyclopaedia
of informal education. Available at:
http://infed.org/mobi/what-is-pedagogy/ (Accessed on: 5 October 2017).
Tsang, M. (2003) “Economic Analysis of Educational
Development in Developing Nations” in Guthrie, J. W. (2003).
Encyclopedia of education. New York: Macmillan ref. USA.
Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (1997) 'Child Development and
the Purpose of Education: A Historical Context of Constructivism in Teaching
Education', in Richardson, V. (ed.) Constructivist Teacher
Education: Building a World of new Understandings. 1 Gunpowder Square
London, EC4A 3DE: The Falmer Press, p.15.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The
development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wiercinski, A. (2011). Hermeneutic education to
understanding: Self – education and the willingness to risk failure. In
Fairfield, P. (2011) Education, Dialogue and Hermeneutics, London and New York:
Continuum, 107 – 123.
Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel,
therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to
education. Mind, brain, and education, 1(1), 3-10.
Hello Maddy, after reading your blog post I found your thoughts very interesting. Something which particularly stood out was your belief that in order to grasp education and learning it must be incorporated as a process of living (Dewey, 1963). Similarly, I conform to this belief as I agree with Coles's (2014) concept of core knowledge not being beneficial for children as this knowledge is often precisely selected to learn from and does not enrich the growth and development of children. Therefore, teachers in primary schools are not encouraging pupils to think critically and act curiously, to inflict their own philosophies and areas of interest. However, if all learning is linked solemnly with real life experiences (Yang and Damasio, 2007), how will children manage with summative assessment?
ReplyDelete